Epistemologi Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn

Pemikiran dan Relevansinya Terhadap Kajian Keilmuan Islam

Authors

  • Rajendra Rahmat Ramadhan Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • M. Guntur Sandi Pratama Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Bimba Valid Fathony Universitas Islam Negeri Prof. KH. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56633/jkp.v20i2.894

Keywords:

Revolution, Science, Kuhn, Knowledge, Islam

Abstract

Thomas Kuhn is a philosopher and scientist who is unique in giving names to the terms he uses in his scientific models.  Kuhn used the term "revolution", to represent a name for development in science which is a discourse in the sense of emphasizing alternatives such as politics. Thomas Kuhn's ideas are interesting for discussion among academics and the development of modern philosophy. This research is a type of library research, namely research whose object of study uses library data in the form of books as the data source. Kuhn's thinking was a rebellion against the positivism paradigm (as was also done by Karl Raimund Popper, Paul Feyerabend, or Stephen Toulmin). Kuhn's ideas were very radical and contributed greatly to post-positivism and postmodern epistemology with its pluralism of scientific paradigms. Thomas Kuhn's thought regarding the "Scientific Revolution" is the idea of ​​a drastic change in knowledge, so that this process is said to be a breakthrough for the "history of science" itself. Starting from a paradigm that becomes a worldview for humans in viewing "knowledge" and is processed into knowledge ready to be tested and criticized. As time goes by, intellectual development among Muslims can borrow from Western civilization to advance Islamic sciences. Because Islam does not cover knowledge.

References

Afriandi Putra, “Epistemologi Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn dan Relevansinya Bagi Studi Al-Qur’an”, jurnal Refleksi, 2015, vol.15, no. 1

Akhyar Yusuf Lubis, Filsafat Ilmu: Klasik Hingga Kontemporer (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015)

Antony Giddens, New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies, (London: Hutchison and Co.Ltd, 1976)

Damsyid Ambo Upe, Asas-Asas Multiple Researches: Dari Nornam K.Denzim hingga John W. Creswell dan Penerapannya (Yogyakarta: Penerbit Tiara Wacana, 2010)

Fritjof Capra, Sains Leonardo: Menguak Kecerdasan Terbesar Masa Reinassance, terj. Heru Apriyono, (Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2010)

Inayatul Ulya dan Nuskhan Abid, “Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn Dan Relevansinya Terhadap Keilmuan Islam”, dalam FIKRAH: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah Dan Studi Keagamaan, Vol 3, Nomor 2, (Kudus: IAIN Kudus, 2015)

Inayatul Ulya dan Nuskhan Abid, “Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn Dan Relevansinya Terhadap Keilmuan Islam”

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, “Anomali,” KBBI Offline Versi 15. 1 (Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2010).

Kuntowijoyo, Islam Sebagai Ilmu: Epistemologi, Metodologi, dan Etika (Jakarta: Teraju, 2005)

M Amin Abdullah, Studi Agama: Normativitas Atau Historisitas?, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1996)

M. Amin Abdullah, Islamic Studies Di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012)

Muhammad Muslih, Filsafat Ilmu: Kajian atas Asumsi Dasar Paradigma dan Kerangka Teori Ilmu Pengetahuan, (Yogyakarta: LESFI, 2016)

Mujiyono Abdillah, Dialektika Hukum Islam & Perubahan Sosial: Sebuah Refleksi Sosiologis Atas Pemikiran Ibn Qayyim Al-Jauziyyah, (Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press Surakarta, 2003)

Osman Bakar, Tauhid dan Sains: Esai-esai Tentang Sejarah dan Filsafat Sains Islam, terj.Yuliani Liputo (Bandung: Pustaka Hidayah, 1994).

Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (Chicago: The University of Chicago, 1970)

Yosephus Sudiantara, Filsafat Ilmu: Inti Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan, (Semarang: Univ Katolik Soegijapranata, 2020)

Zaprulkhan, Filsafat Ilmu; Sebuah Analisis Kontemporer, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2016.

Published

2025-01-10